FIPS 140-1 PDF

  • June 20, 2019

The selective application of technological and related procedural safeguards is an important responsibility of every Federal organization in. FIPS (Federal Information Processing Standard) is the benchmark for validating the effectiveness of cryptographic hardware. If a product has a FIPS You need to know if Symantec Endpoint Encryption(SEE) and/or Guardian Edge Hard Drive (GEHD) encryption is a validated FIPS and/or

Author: Shaktirr Dahn
Country: Thailand
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Sex
Published (Last): 12 November 2011
Pages: 208
PDF File Size: 6.54 Mb
ePub File Size: 6.73 Mb
ISBN: 826-5-37239-836-5
Downloads: 51410
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Tejin

This article has multiple issues. Sign up using Email and Password. Since validation is an expensive process, this gives software vendors an incentive to postpone changes to their software and can result in software that does not receive security updates until the next validation.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology NIST issues the Publication Series to coordinate the requirements and standards for cryptographic modules which include both hardware and software components for use by departments and agencies of the United States federal government.

FIPS – Wikipedia

You can no longer have a product validated fip FIPSbecause it is no longer a current standard. Post as a guest Name. The use of validated cryptographic modules is required by the United States Government for all unclassified uses of cryptography. A module that is FIPScompliant is not more secure than a module that is FIPScompliant, it is only more up-to-date in the certification process.

Is Symantec Endpoint Encryption a validated FIPS 140-1 and FIPS 140-2 Cryptographic Module?

Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. The -1 or -2 part is a version number.

Computer security standards Cryptography standards Standards of the United States. This article includes a list of referencesbut its sources remain unclear because it has insufficient inline citations.

FIPSissued on 11 Januarywas developed by a government and industry working group, composed of vendors and users of cryptographic equipment. For Levels 2 and higher, the operating platform upon which the validation is applicable is also listed.

  ACEGI SECURITY FRAMEWORK PDF

Vendors do not always maintain their baseline validations. Due to the way in which the validation process is set up, a software vendor 1401 required to re-validate their FIPSvalidated module for every change, no matter how small, to the software; this re-validation is required even for obvious bug or security fixes.

By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Cookie PolicyPrivacy Policyand our Terms of Service. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. The requirements cover not only the cryptographic modules themselves but also their documentation and at the highest security level some aspects of the comments contained in the source code. The result may be that validated software is less safe than a non-validated equivalent.

FIPS is a new version of the standard which is currently under development. The draft issued on 11 Sephowever, reverted to four security levels and limits the security levels of software to levels 1 and 2.

public key infrastructure – FIPS and FIPS – Information Security Stack Exchange

Email Required, but never shown. Darren Moffat, Oracle Solaris. There are 4 steps, not 8 — it’s just that the requirements for climbing those steps were tweaked.

Sign up or log in Sign up using Google. Please improve this by adding secondary or tertiary sources. User agencies desiring to implement cryptographic modules should confirm that the module they are using is covered by an existing validation certificate. Retrieved from ” https: Articles lacking in-text citations from July All articles lacking in-text citations Articles needing additional references from August All articles needing additional references Articles cips reliable references from January All articles lacking reliable references Articles with multiple maintenance issues Articles containing potentially dated statements from December All articles containing potentially dated statements.

Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page.

  2010 ACURA TSX SERVICE MANUAL PDF

FIPS does not purport to provide sufficient conditions to guarantee that a module conforming to its requirements is secure, still less that a system built using such modules is secure. Learn how and when to remove these template messages. This article needs additional citations for verification. FIPSissued on 25 Maytakes account of changes in available technology and official standards sinceand of comments received from the vendor, tester, and user communities.

Post Your Answer Discard By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of serviceprivacy policy and cookie policyand that your continued fkps of the website is subject to these policies. This page was last edited on 12 Marchat Sign up using Facebook.

January Learn how and when to remove this template message. Please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations. Views Read Edit View history. In addition to the specified levels, Section 4. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Home Questions Tags Users Unanswered. July Learn how and when to remove this template message. This article relies too much on references to primary sources.

By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. The Government of Canada also recommends the use of FIPS validated cryptographic modules in unclassified applications of its departments.

It does not specify in detail what level of security is required by any particular application. August Learn how and when to remove this template message. If a product contains countermeasures against these attacks, they must be documented and tested, but protections are not required to achieve a given level.